Pakistan's Constitutional Court Questions Punjab Over Teacher Accused of Using Fake Credentials
The Federal Constitutional Court has issued notices to a Punjab teacher accused of getting his job on fake credentials and to a former provincial law officer, and has asked why the teacher's qualifications went unchecked for four years.

Pakistan's Federal Constitutional Court (FCCP) has issued notices to a Punjab government teacher accused of obtaining his job on fake academic credentials, and to a former Assistant Advocate General of Punjab. The court is hearing an appeal filed by the Punjab Education Department. The hearing took place on Thursday 22 October 2026 before a two-member bench headed by Acting Chief Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, according to the state news agency APP and Capital News Point.
How the case reached the court
Punjab's Additional Advocate General told the court that the teacher first obtained a teaching post on the strength of an engineering qualification and served for about four years. He later resigned and applied again, this time on the basis of an intermediate (higher secondary) certificate.
The law officer said alleged fraud came to light when the department scrutinised the second application, and the department rejected it. The teacher then petitioned the Lahore High Court, which, by the law officer's account, directed that he be kept in service. The then Assistant Advocate General filed an intra-court appeal against that order and later withdrew it, which the Additional Advocate General said was done without permission from the competent authority.
Questions from the bench
The bench asked the education department what action it had taken after the alleged forgery surfaced and sought details of its inquiry, along with verification of the teacher's degrees. It also asked why his credentials had not been verified during his four years in service.
The court also asked why the intra-court appeal was withdrawn and whether the Punjab government had taken any action against the former law officer. Notices were issued to both men seeking their responses. No final decision has been reported, and the forgery allegations remain subject to judicial determination.
Why verification at entry matters
The case shows a familiar weakness in public hiring: a qualification accepted at the point of appointment, and never confirmed with the issuing body, can go unchallenged for years. If doubts emerge later, the employer has to unwind an appointment that may already have been protected by court orders.
Public employers can reduce this risk by confirming every qualification with the issuing board or university before an appointment letter is issued and keeping a written record of that confirmation. A fresh check should also be run whenever an employee reapplies on the basis of a different qualification.
This News Desk report summarises information published by the sources above, written in our own words. Persons named in criminal matters are accused, not convicted, unless a court has ruled otherwise. To report an error, use our contact page.
More from the News Desk
- Brazil: Federal Police Search Five Sites in Macapá Over Alleged Forged University Diplomas
- Kenya: Former Auditor-General's Office Employee Charged Over Allegedly Forged KCSE Certificate
- Indonesia: court rejects Roy Suryo's objection, defamation trial over claims about Jokowi's diploma moves to evidence
- Chhattisgarh: tenth arrest in alleged fake marksheet racket behind anganwadi helper appointments
