UGC show cause notice — Sangai International University asked why its name should not be removed from the list of universities under Section 2(f) of the UGC Act, 1956
Official Record · UGC Show Cause Notice

Sangai International University — UGC Show Cause Notice on
Removal from the Section 2(f) List

AuthorityUniversity Grants Commission
ReferenceF. 8-19/2015 (CPP-I/PU)
IssuedDecember 2023 (stamped 19 DEC 2023)
Information pending since2015
WHAT THE NOTICE STATES

Eight years of unanswered UGC letters, and a proposal to delist

The UGC records that information it requested for inspection purposes has been pending since 2015, despite five written communications over six years. It gives the university 15 days to show cause why action should not be taken to remove its name from the list of universities maintained under Section 2(f) of the UGC Act, 1956, and asks the Manipur higher education department to act immediately.

Document details

Reference numberNo. F. 8-19/2015 (CPP-I/PU)
Document typeShow Cause Notice (not an RTI reply)
DateDecember 2023; office stamp 19 DEC 2023
Mode of despatchSpeed Post / E-mail
Issued byUniversity Grants Commission, Ministry of Education, Government of India, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110002
Signed by(Monika), Deputy Secretary and (R.I.S Bhardwaj), Under Secretary
Addressed toThe Vice Chancellor, Sangai International University, Churachandpur - 795128, Manipur
Copy toThe Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Government of Manipur, 4th Floor, Western Block, New Secretariat, Manipur - 795 001, “with the request to take immediate action and send comments urgently”
Statutory basisUniversity Grants Commission Act, 1956 read with the UGC (Establishment of and Maintenance of Standards in Private Universities) Regulations, 2003
Time to respond15 days from the date of issue
Approval“This is issued with the approval of Competent Authority.”

Questions and official answers

This document is a show cause notice issued by the UGC, not a reply to an RTI application, so it contains no question-and-answer table. Its operative paragraphs are set out below in the UGC's own wording.

No.ParagraphOfficial reply
1The history of the UGC's requests for information
“This has reference to UGC letters of even number dated 03.07.2015, 12.08.2015, 21.10.2016, 01.03.2019 & 11.01.2021 (copies enclosed) wherein the University was requested to provide information for inspection purposes. The required information is pending since 2015. In spite of repeated written communications, the University has failed to submit the required information.”
2The action proposed and the opportunity to respond
“In view of above, under the provisions of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956 read with UGC (Establishment of and Maintenance of Standards in Private Universities) Regulations, 2003, You are hereby given an opportunity to show cause, within 15 days from the date of the issue of this notice, as to why action against the university be not taken by the UGC to remove its name from the list of Universities as maintained by the UGC under Section 2(f) of the UGC Act, 1956”
3Authority for issue
“This is issued with the approval of Competent Authority.”
4Direction to the state government (endorsement)
Copy to the Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Govt. of Manipur — “(with the request to take immediate action and send comments urgently)”

Key findings

Information pending since 2015

The UGC states the information it required for inspection purposes has been outstanding for more than eight years at the date of the notice.

Five written communications, no submission

Letters of 03.07.2015, 12.08.2015, 21.10.2016, 01.03.2019 and 11.01.2021 are listed as enclosed. The notice states the university failed to submit the required information in spite of them.

Removal from the Section 2(f) list proposed

The notice asks the university to show cause why the UGC should not act to remove its name from the list of universities it maintains under Section 2(f) of the UGC Act, 1956.

Fifteen days to respond

The opportunity to show cause is limited to 15 days from the date of issue of the notice.

State government asked to act immediately

The Manipur Department of Higher Education was endorsed a copy with a request to take immediate action and send comments urgently.

No inspection has been completed

Because the information was never supplied, the inspection the UGC sought to carry out could not proceed. The notice records a failure to cooperate, not the result of an inspection.

Timeline from the record

03.07.2015
UGC LETTER

First request for information

Information sought for inspection purposes.

12.08.2015
UGC LETTER

Second request

Reminder issued the following month.

21.10.2016
UGC LETTER

Third request

Information still outstanding.

01.03.2019
UGC LETTER

Fourth request

Nearly four years after the first letter.

11.01.2021
UGC LETTER

Fifth request

Final letter listed before the notice.

19.12.2023
SHOW CAUSE

Notice F. 8-19/2015 (CPP-I/PU)

Fifteen days to show cause why the university's name should not be removed from the Section 2(f) list.

SCOPE NOTE

What this record shows:

  • The UGC issued a show cause notice to Sangai International University, Churachandpur, Manipur, in December 2023.
  • Information requested for inspection purposes had been pending since 2015, across five listed letters.
  • The UGC proposed to consider removing the university's name from the list maintained under Section 2(f) of the UGC Act, 1956.
  • The Manipur Department of Higher Education was asked to take immediate action and send comments urgently.

What it does not show:

  • It does not state that the university has been removed from the Section 2(f) list. It is a notice proposing that action and inviting a response.
  • It does not state that any Sangai International University degree is invalid, fake or wrongly issued.
  • It does not record any finding about the university's academic standards, infrastructure or students — the inspection it relates to never took place.
  • It does not show what the university replied, or what the UGC decided afterwards. Readers should check the UGC's current list before drawing any conclusion.

Every statement on this page is drawn from the official document described above. Readers should rely on the original document and the issuing authority for any decision.

RTI filed by Kamesh
ACFE Member (USA) | RTI Activist & Education Fraud Investigator | Covered by Times of India & South China Morning Post

Kamesh files RTIs across police, university, and regulatory authorities to document education fraud and institutional accountability.