Case disposed of — HP-PERC order of 13.05.2024 records no irregularities in admitting the 153 students and closes Suo-Moto Case No. 11 of 2023
RTI Record · HP-PERC · Final Order

IEC University — HP-PERC Final Order in
Suo-Moto Case No. 11 of 2023

AuthorityH.P. Private Educational Institutions Regulatory Commission
ReferenceHPPERC/302/RTI Vol-X/2024-784
Dated26.06.2024
Order of13.05.2024 — case disposed of
WHAT THE ORDER STATES

No discrepancies, no irregularities, nothing survives — the case is closed

The order sheet of 13.05.2024 records that, on perusal of the original attendance record of all 153 students, the Commission found no irregularities in admitting them, consistent with the expert committee's observation. It directed the original records be returned to the university and disposed of the matter. The same reply also states that verifying degrees awarded by a private university falls outside HP-PERC's purview.

Document details

Reference numberNo. HPPERC/302/RTI Vol-X/2024-784
Date of reply26.06.2024 (handwritten 26/6/24)
Issued byPIO-cum-Law Officer, H.P. Private Educational Institutions Regulatory Commission
Public authorityHimachal Pradesh Private Educational Institutions Regulatory Commission, MC Parking Complex, 3rd Floor, Tutikandi, Shimla-171005
ApplicantKamesh (the reply carries a variant spelling of the applicant's name on its face)
Application received26.06.2024
SubjectSupply of Information under RTI Act 2005
Institution concernedIEC University, Baddi, Himachal Pradesh
Annexure-AList of 153 students to whom degrees were awarded by IEC University, called for by the Commission during the hearing in Case No. 11 of 2023. Four pages, bearing the RTI supply stamp. The list is not reproduced on this page.
Annexure-BOrder Sheet, HP-PERC, Shimla — Case Called 11 of 2023, dated 13.05.2024, Suo Moto v/s IEC University. Signed by Prof. Shashi Kant Sharma, Member, and Sh. Lalit Kumar, Member.
Appellate AuthorityAppellate Authority-cum-Member-1, HP-PERC, Shimla-171005, within 30 days

Questions and official answers

The reply sets out the information sought and the Commission's answer in a four-row table, reproduced below in the Commission's own wording. The operative text of the order sheet at Annexure-B follows in the findings.

No.Information soughtOfficial reply
1Verify the degrees mentioned above against your record.
“The verification of degrees of students awarded by any private University does not comes under the purview of HP-PERC”
2Confirm if these names are present in the list of 153 fake degree issued by IEC University.
“The list of 153 students to whom degrees were awarded by IEC University called by this Commission during hearing in Case No. 11 of 2023 is enclosed as Annexure-A”

Note the Commission's wording: it describes Annexure-A as a list of students to whom degrees were awarded, not as a list of fake degrees.

3Provide any available information or findings from your ongoing investigations that pertain to these degrees
“A copy of final orders in case No. 11 of 2023 is enclosed as Annexure-B”
4If possible copy of 153 students names
“Information enclosed as per Point No. 2.”
BAnnexure-B — Order Sheet, Case Called 11 of 2023, dated 13.05.2024. Suo Moto v/s IEC University. Present: For Petitioner: None. For Respondent: None.
“The matter was called up for hearing today. None appeared. On perusal of original attendance record of all 153 students, it has been found that there are no irregularities in admitting these 153 students and the same has been observed by the expert committee. The Commission hereby observes that there is no discrepancies/ irregularities in admitting these 153 students, hence the original record be returned to respondent University and nothing survives in this matter and the same is disposed off.”

Key findings

No irregularities found

The Commission, on perusal of the original attendance record of all 153 students, found “no irregularities in admitting these 153 students”, consistent with the expert committee's observation.

Case disposed of on 13.05.2024

In the order's words, “nothing survives in this matter and the same is disposed off”. The original records were directed to be returned to the university.

Annexure-A is a list of degrees awarded

The Commission describes the annexed list as students “to whom degrees were awarded by IEC University”, called for during the hearing — not as a list of fake degrees.

Degree verification is outside the regulator's purview

Asked to verify degrees against its record, the Commission replied that verification of degrees awarded by any private university does not come under HP-PERC's purview.

No party appeared at the final hearing

The order sheet records “For Petitioner: None” and “For Respondent: None”. The matter was decided on the record.

Personal data released under RTI

Annexure-A names 153 private individuals together with their fathers' names. It is not reproduced on this site.

Timeline from the record

2023
REGISTERED

Suo-Moto Case No. 11 of 2023

HP-PERC registers the issue concerning 153 degrees in the name of IEC University.

Sept–Nov 2023
INSPECTED

Two expert committees

Attendance, examination and fee records of all 153 students examined on site.

06.05.2024
RTI REPLY

Status: pending adjudication

HP-PERC releases both inspection reports under RTI.

13.05.2024
ORDER

Case disposed of

No discrepancies or irregularities found; original records returned to the university.

26.06.2024
RTI REPLY

Reply HPPERC/302/RTI Vol-X/2024-784

The final order and the list of 153 degree recipients released under RTI.

SCOPE NOTE

What this record shows:

  • HP-PERC's order sheet of 13.05.2024 in Suo-Moto Case No. 11 of 2023 records that there are no discrepancies or irregularities in admitting the 153 students.
  • The Commission directed the original records be returned to IEC University and disposed of the matter.
  • The Commission states that verification of degrees awarded by a private university is outside its purview.
  • The Commission describes Annexure-A as the list of students to whom degrees were awarded by IEC University, called for during the hearing.

What it does not show:

  • It does not find that any IEC University degree was fake. The opposite: it records that no irregularities were found in the admissions examined.
  • It does not confirm the authenticity of any individual degree — the Commission expressly says that is outside its purview, and must be put to the university.
  • It does not name this page's subjects: the 153 individuals listed in Annexure-A are not reproduced here.
  • It does not cover any matter outside the mandate of Case No. 11 of 2023.

Every statement on this page is drawn from the official document described above. Readers should rely on the original document and the issuing authority for any decision.

RTI filed by Kamesh
ACFE Member (USA) | RTI Activist & Education Fraud Investigator | Covered by Times of India & South China Morning Post

Kamesh files RTIs across police, university, and regulatory authorities to document education fraud and institutional accountability.