RECOGNITION IS PERIOD-BOUND — ODL recognition runs year by year. A degree is covered by the recognition in force for the session in which the student was admitted — not by the university's status generally.
Investigation

Subharti University's Distance Degrees:
Fifteen Years of Recognition, Year by Year

Asked for the recognition status of Subharti University's distance programmes, the UGC's Distance Education Bureau supplied a year-by-year table running from 2009-10 to 2025-26, backed by nine annexures.

SourceUGC — Distance Education Bureau
ReferenceF. No.1-432/2024(DEB-I/RTI)
ByKamesh

Background: why this RTI was filed

Distance-education recognition is the single most misread fact in Indian higher education. It is not a permanent attribute of a university. It is granted programme by programme, for defined periods, and it can lapse, be limited on appeal, or be corrected by a later corrigendum.

That is why a question phrased as ‘is this university recognised?’ rarely produces a usable answer. The question that does is: what recognition was in force for this programme, in the session this student was admitted? This RTI asked the UGC's Distance Education Bureau for the whole history, and the Bureau supplied it — a nine-entry table and thirty-three pages of underlying orders.

SOURCE DOCUMENT EVIDENCE
DocumentReply under the Right to Information Act, 2005
ReferenceF. No.1-432/2024(DEB-I/RTI)
Dated17 July 2024
AuthorityUniversity Grants Commission, Distance Education Bureau, 35 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi – 110001
Issued by(Dr. N. P. Meena), Education Officer/ CPIO
ApplicationRTI dated 03/07/2024
InstitutionSwami Vivekanand Subharti University, Subhartipuram, NH-58, Delhi–Haridwar Meerut By Pass Road, Meerut – 250 005, Uttar Pradesh

What the document says

The reply opens by placing verification where the records are: degrees, diplomas and certificates are verified or validated by the issuing university only. What the DEB can supply, it says, is the recognition status — and it then does so.

The table runs to nine entries. The first three are by the erstwhile Distance Education Council of IGNOU, covering 2009-10 to 2011-12, then 2012-13 to 2013-14, then 2014-15. From 2015-16 recognition passes to the UGC's own Distance Education Bureau, covering 2015-16, 2016-17 to 2017-18, 2018-19 to 2019-20, and 2020-21.

The last two entries are where the detail matters. Entry viii covers 2021-22, academic session beginning November 2021, revised from July 2021, running to 2025-26 — but with the words 'up to January, 2026 only' printed in the table. Entry ix covers 2022-23, session beginning September 2022, revised from July-August 2022, and runs 'to January, 2023 only'.

The annexures fill in what those bare periods mean. The Commission Order of November 2021 lists twenty ODL programmes recognised and four refused — Masters of Hospital Administration, Master of Arts (Yoga), Master of Fine Arts (Painting) and Master of Business Administration, the last for non-submission of prior regulatory approval. The December 2021 appeal decision reverses that MBA refusal. A corrigendum of May 2022 then limits the MBA recognition to academic year 2021-22 and January 2022 only.

On centres the reply is flat: the UGC has not granted any approval to the university to open an off campus or study centre anywhere. Private universities cannot affiliate colleges for their own degrees, and cannot franchise programmes to private institutions for distance mode.

Finally, the rule that decides most individual cases. An admission taken in an approved ODL programme during a recognition period stands recognised until the course is completed, even if the university does not hold recognition for later years — provided the programme was offered within the territorial jurisdiction norms and in conformity with the ODL Regulations.

Key findings

An unbroken recognition record from 2009-10

The table runs from 2009-2010 through to 2025-26, first under the erstwhile Distance Education Council of IGNOU and from 2015-16 under the UGC's Distance Education Bureau.

Two entries carry an express cut-off

Entry viii runs to 2025-26 up to January 2026 only. Entry ix runs to January 2023 only. The limitation is printed in the table itself.

No approval for any off-campus or study centre, anywhere

The reply states that the UGC has not granted any approval to the university to open an off campus or study centre anywhere, and that a private university cannot open centres even within the state without UGC approval.

No affiliation and no franchising

Private universities cannot affiliate any college or institution for courses leading to their own degrees, and cannot offer programmes through franchising arrangements with private institutions for distance mode.

Admissions during a recognition period remain recognised

An admission taken in an approved ODL programme during a recognition period stands recognised until the course is completed, even if recognition is not held for later years — subject to territorial jurisdiction norms and the ODL Regulations.

Equivalence is decided elsewhere

For higher education, equivalence is decided by the university concerned; for employment and promotion, by the employing organisation.

“Admission taken in the approved Open and Distance Learning (ODL) program during the recognition period stands recognized till the completion of course even if the University does not have recognition for further years.”

— UGC Distance Education Bureau, F. No.1-432/2024(DEB-I/RTI), 17 July 2024

What employers and students should know

Match the session, not the university. A candidate admitted to a recognised programme in a session covered by one of these nine entries is, on the face of this reply, covered until they complete that course. A candidate admitted to a programme that was never recognised, or in a gap, is not — and no later recognition repairs that.

Check the programme too, not just the year. The annexures show programmes refused for specific reasons: a discipline prohibited in ODL mode, a practical component, a missing regulatory approval. MBA in particular was refused, restored on appeal, then limited by corrigendum to a single year.

Where the teaching happened is a separate question with a blunt answer. The UGC states it has approved no off-campus or study centre for this university anywhere. A distance programme delivered through a franchised centre falls outside what this reply describes as permitted, whatever the year.

And equivalence is not the UGC's call. For further study it is decided by the university admitting the student; for a job or a promotion, by the employer.

ACTION STEPS FOR AFFECTED PEOPLE
  1. Establish the exact session of admission and the exact programme name, from the student's own records.
  2. Match both against the nine recognition entries and the annexure lists for that period.
  3. For an MBA, check the year specifically — recognition was refused, restored on appeal, then limited by corrigendum to 2021-22 and January 2022.
  4. Ask where the programme was taught. The UGC states no off-campus or study centre has been approved for this university anywhere.
  5. Write to the university's registrar quoting the enrolment number for verification of the individual record.
  6. Keep the reply reference — F. No.1-432/2024(DEB-I/RTI) — and note which annexure covers the period you rely on.
SCOPE NOTE

What this record shows:

  • The UGC-DEB sets out nine programme-wise ODL recognition entries for the university covering 2009-10 to 2025-26.
  • Two entries carry express cut-offs printed in the table: January 2026 and January 2023 respectively.
  • The UGC states it has granted no approval for any off campus or study centre for this university anywhere.
  • The reply states an admission taken in an approved ODL programme during a recognition period stands recognised until completion of the course.

What it does not show:

  • It does not state that any individual degree or certificate is genuine, forged or invalid.
  • It does not list, on its own face, every programme recognised in every period — those lists are in the annexures.
  • It records no finding of wrongdoing against the university and no penalty.
  • It does not decide equivalence, which the reply assigns to the university concerned or to the employing organisation.

Every statement on this page is drawn from the official document described above. Readers should rely on the original document and the issuing authority for any decision.

RTI filed by Kamesh
ACFE Member (USA) · RTI Activist & Education Fraud Investigator · Covered by Times of India & South China Morning Post

Kamesh files RTIs across police, university, and regulatory authorities to document education fraud and institutional accountability.